[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]

unto your children, how much more shall your Father which is in
heaven give good things to them that ask him?
15. Make five original syllogisms[26] on the following models:
MAJOR PREMISE: He who administers arsenic gives poison.
MINOR PREMISE: The prisoner administered arsenic to the victim.
CONCLUSION: Therefore the prisoner is a poisoner.
MAJOR PREMISE: All dogs are quadrupeds.
MINOR PREMISE: This animal is a biped.
CONCLUSION: Therefore this animal is not a dog.
16. Prepare either the positive or the negative side of the following question for debate: The recall of judges
should be adopted as a national principle.
17. Is this question debatable? Benedict Arnold was a gentleman. Give reasons for your answer.
"1_1_24">CHAPTER XXIII. INFLUENCING BY ARGUMENT 156
The Art of Public Speaking
18. Criticise any street or dinner-table argument you have heard recently.
19. Test the reasoning of any of the speeches given in this volume.
20. Make a short speech arguing in favor of instruction in public speaking in the public evening schools.
21. (a) Clip a newspaper editorial in which the reasoning is weak. (b) Criticise it. (c) Correct it.
22. Make a list of three subjects for debate, selected from the monthly magazines.
23. Do the same from the newspapers.
24. Choosing your own question and side, prepare a brief suitable for a ten-minute debating argument. The
following models of briefs may help you:
DEBATE
RESOLVED: That armed intervention is not justifiable on the part of any nation to collect, on behalf of
private individuals, financial claims against any American nation.[27]
BRIEF OF AFFIRMATIVE ARGUMENT
First speaker--Chafee
Armed intervention for collection of private claims from any American nation is not justifiable, for
1. It is wrong in principle, because
(a) It violates the fundamental principles of international law for a very slight cause
(b) It is contrary to the proper function of the State, and
(c) It is contrary to justice, since claims are exaggerated.
Second speaker--Hurley
2. It is disastrous in its results, because
(a) It incurs danger of grave international complications
(b) It tends to increase the burden of debt in the South American republics
(c) It encourages a waste of the world's capital, and
(d) It disturbs peace and stability in South America.
Third speaker--Bruce
3. It is unnecessary to collect in this way, because
(a) Peaceful methods have succeeded
"1_1_24">CHAPTER XXIII. INFLUENCING BY ARGUMENT 157
The Art of Public Speaking
(b) If these should fail, claims should be settled by The Hague Tribunal
(c) The fault has always been with European States when force has been used, and
(d) In any case, force should not be used, for it counteracts the movement towards peace.
BRIEF OF NEGATIVE ARGUMENT
First speaker--Branch
Armed intervention for the collection of private financial claims against some American States is justifiable,
for
1. When other means of collection have failed, armed intervention against any nation is essentially proper,
because
(a) Justice should always be secured
(b) Non-enforcement of payment puts a premium on dishonesty
(c) Intervention for this purpose is sanctioned by the best international authority
(d) Danger of undue collection is slight and can be avoided entirely by submission of claims to The Hague
Tribunal before intervening.
Second speaker--Stone
2. Armed intervention is necessary to secure justice in tropical America, for
(a) The governments of this section constantly repudiate just debts
(b) They insist that the final decision about claims shall rest with their own corrupt courts
(c) They refuse to arbitrate sometimes.
Third speaker--Dennett
3. Armed intervention is beneficial in its results, because
(a) It inspires responsibility
(b) In administering custom houses it removes temptation to revolutions
(c) It gives confidence to desirable capital.
Among others, the following books were used in the preparation of the arguments:
N. "The Monroe Doctrine," by T.B. Edgington. Chapters 22-28.
"Digest of International Law," by J.B. Moore. Report of Penfield of proceedings before Hague Tribunal in
1903.
"1_1_24">CHAPTER XXIII. INFLUENCING BY ARGUMENT 158
The Art of Public Speaking
"Statesman's Year Book" (for statistics).
A. Minister Drago's appeal to the United States, in Foreign Relations of United States, 1903.
President Roosevelt's Message, 1905, pp. 33-37.
And articles in the following magazines (among many others):
"Journal of Political Economy," December, 1906.
"Atlantic Monthly," October, 1906.
"North American Review," Vol. 183, p. 602.
All of these contain material valuable for both sides, except those marked "N" and "A," which are useful only
for the negative and affirmative, respectively.
NOTE:--Practise in debating is most helpful to the public speaker, but if possible each debate should be
under the supervision of some person whose word will be respected, so that the debaters might show regard
for courtesy, accuracy, effective reasoning, and the necessity for careful preparation. The Appendix contains a
list of questions for debate.
25. Are the following points well considered?
THE INHERITANCE TAX IS NOT A GOOD SOCIAL REFORM MEASURE
A. Does not strike at the root of the evil
1. Fortunes not a menace in themselves A fortune of $500,000 may be a greater social evil than one of
$500,000,000
2. Danger of wealth depends on its wrong accumulation and use
3. Inheritance tax will not prevent rebates, monopoly, discrimination, bribery, etc.
4. Laws aimed at unjust accumulation and use of wealth furnish the true remedy.
B. It would be evaded
1. Low rates are evaded [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]